"Taymor's Mythology"
by Alex Ross
The New Yorker, Oct. 25, 2004.
In the fall of 1791, Mozart was a sick man who
felt his life slipping away. Still, he was intensely happy. The motive
for his joy was “The Magic Flute,” which had opened at the end of
September, in Vienna. Representatives of the musical élite were hailing
the opera as perhaps the richest of Mozart’s career. Antonio Salieri
told his sometime rival that it was “worthy of being played at the
greatest festival for the greatest monarchs.” Members of the
brotherhood of Masons smiled among themselves as they recognized a
kindred spirit at work: the tale of handsome young Tamino, who passes a
series of tests set by the mysterious magus Sarastro, was both a
parable and a parody of the rituals of Freemasonry. Yet “The Magic
Flute” wasn’t a proper opera at all; it was a Singspiel,
a hybrid genre akin to musical theatre. The staging aimed to astonish
the eyes: one visitor reported seeing “a thousand grotesque forms.”
Tickets cost between seven and seventeen kreuzer—about what you’d spend
on a round of beers after the show. Mozart had made his imperial art
democratic, and he exulted in the many-sidedness of his appeal. “What
really makes me happy,” he wrote to his wife, “is the Silent applause!—one can feel how this opera is rising and rising.”
I reread stories of Mozart’s last months just before seeing Julie
Taymor’s production of “The Magic Flute,” at the Metropolitan Opera.
They stayed with me as Taymor’s deeply dazzling vision took hold.
“Silent applause” is an apt phrase for what happens when a listener’s
inward experience locks in synch with the experience of several
thousand others. It’s the sense of a performance “rising and rising,”
as Mozart said; of a jaded, lonely crowd made to grin like kids; of a
world gone right. I hung on to the feeling as long as I could.
"The Magic Flute” is half mystery play, half
street comedy. Directors usually bend it in whatever direction their
sensibility lies. Taymor, who first directed the opera back in 1993,
well before she created her Broadway production of “The Lion King,”
does not try to resolve its tensions. Instead, she mobilizes every
device in her repertoire to render with extreme vivacity whatever
Mozart and his librettist, Emanuel Schikaneder, throw at her. To the
usual Masonic symbology she adds motifs from the Kabbalah, Tantric
Buddhism, Bunraku, Indonesian puppet theatre, and so on. The Met stage
has never been so alive with movement, so charged with color, so
brilliant to the eye. The outward effect is of a shimmering cultural
kaleidoscope, with all manner of mystical and folk traditions blending
together. Behind the surface lies a melancholy sense that history has
never permitted such a synthesis—that Mozart’s theme of love and power
united is nothing more than a fever dream. But Taymor allows the
Enlightenment fantasy to play out to the end.
Mystery sets the tone before comedy takes over. Forty-three
triangles hang in a spooky, asymmetrical pattern on the stage curtain.
James Levine’s tempos have been exhilaratingly fleet of late, but I
wish he’d lingered longer on the three majestic, light-dark chords that
set the music in motion—E-flat major, C minor, E-flat in first
inversion. They pose a question that the opera never quite answers.
George Tsypin, who created sets for “War and Peace” at the Met two
seasons ago, suspends Masonic and Kabbalistic emblems in towering
Plexiglas façades, gateways, and columns. That these sets could serve
as the backdrop for some very scary Vegas magic show—David Copperfield
raising the dead, perhaps—is part of the whimsical appeal of the
production, which stops well short of taking itself too seriously.
An incredible variety of figures and creatures swirl through
Tsypin’s hieroglyphic castles. Tamino and Sarastro both look like
Japanese princes, while Papageno, the bird-catcher well on his way to
being a bird himself, has a streetwise look, wearing a green jumpsuit
and a sporty beak cap. The Queen of the Night, who tries to lure Tamino
from his appointed path, appears with huge moth wings fluttering behind
her. Monostatos, Sarastro’s wayward henchman, is a bit of a bat. What
might have seemed arbitrary in another production here seems simply
right, because Taymor controls each tableau with a painter’s eye. Mark
Dendy obtains some of the sharpest dancing I’ve seen on the Met stage;
when Papageno immobilizes Monostatos’s would-be tough guys with his
magic bells, they become screamingly gay Broadway hoofers. Meanwhile,
all manner of puppet beasts, including serpents, bears, and the entire
contents of Papageno’s birdcage, stream around the singers. The
animals, created with the help of Michael Curry, become co-stars of the
piece, not because they impart a “Lion King” glamour but because they
move so buoyantly to the music. At times, the entire stage is dancing
to Mozart’s time.
Matthew Polenzani, a lyric tenor with a lovely, stately voice and a
stiff stage presence, never looked altogether comfortable as Tamino.
Dorothea Röschmann, as Pamina, relished the challenge, projecting a
dusky gleam in her lower register that I don’t remember hearing in her
“Figaro” début last year. L’ubica Vargicová was dangerously hesitant in
her opening aria, but she showed fire alongside the required coloratura
precision in “Der Hölle Rache” later on. Kwangchul Youn was a noble
Sarastro, although he lacked some strength at the bottom of his range.
With no fewer than four singers performing in the house for the first
time—Anna Christy did well as Papagena—this was a potentially nervous
cast, but Levine kept them all on track and maintained a limpid tone
from beginning to end.
One singer stood out from the others in his enthusiasm to embody
Taymor’s vision: twenty-six-year-old Rodion Pogossov, who until
recently had been part of the Met’s Young Artist program. He filled in
on short notice for Matthias Goerne as Papageno, having never sung a
major role at the Met or anywhere else. He has a mellifluous baritone
voice and is a natural, extroverted performer. Basically, he rocks. In
place of the cutesy clowning that star baritones often indulge in, he
created an antic, athletic, sexy bird-man on the prowl. Perhaps the Old
Guard disapproved when Papageno broke into a strutting, arm-swinging
hip-hop dance, but it’s about time the Met got some flava.

Two lessons emerge from the soon-to-be-legendary
phenomenon of this “Magic Flute.” One is that Taymor has a great future
at the house. If I were Joseph Volpe—and, happily, I’m not—I would be
stalking her with offers for future projects; at the top of the list
would be Wagner’s “Ring.” The Met’s eighteen-year-old “Ring,” the
“Walküre” installment of which is now playing in a wildly uneven,
weirdly cast performance under Valery Gergiev, has tilted from the
grand to the grim. Taymor, with her flair for myth, might produce a
“Ring” for the ages.
The other lesson is more wistful. When I got home, I wanted to
write, Gene Shalit style, “This Flute’s a hoot! Run, don’t walk!” But
there was no point in telling anyone to go anywhere; only a few
three-hundred-dollar tickets remained, and these were quickly sold.
(There will be five more performances in April; tickets go on sale
November 21st.) Whenever the Met stumbles onto something truly
wonderful, such as this “Magic Flute,” or “Salome” last season, those
in the know snatch up all the tickets before those in the dark can get
a taste of what opera can achieve. Such is the enigma of classical
music; the better it is, the more inaccessible, until, in its most
rarefied form, it hardly exists. Perhaps Mozart took joy in the triumph
of “The Magic Flute” because it showed him a way out of that gleaming
prison: he could see a real public at last. Then he wrote his Requiem
and died.